Blog

Business development and communications for growing businesses.

Giving God’s Story Another Try

Cheryl Dack found my book through a conversation on Scot McKnight’s blog.  She is the guest editor for Porpoise Diving Life and agreed to review it for a forthcoming issue.  Cheryl walked away from Christianity several years ago and after reading my book is considering what that means in her life. These are the reasons why I spent so many countless hours working through the Gospel…because its good news.

—————————————————————————————–

From Cheryl’s blog.

Sometimes we are absolutely certain we understand something, and are in fact so sure of our comprehension, we base our entire lives on it. I was sure I understood Christianity and even more sure I had no use for it. And then I read Discovering the God Imagination, by Jonathan Brink and it changed everything.

I hope I’m not getting anyone’s hopes up. I should probably clarify: I’m not going to start attending church and I still don’t believe in hell. But I’m literally and figuratively re-opening the book on God. Yeah…that book. I have a love-hate relationship with the Bible, but thanks to Brink, I’m giving it another read.

If you were to take the classic fairy tale, Cinderella, cut each individual word out, throw all these words into a hat, shake them around, pour them out on the table and ask someone unfamiliar with the Cinderella storyline to use the individual words to create a story, it is unlikely that the end result would be the version of the story we grew up with. Sure, there would be a pretty dress, a pumpkin coach, a beautiful maiden and a romantic ball, but the way the happily-ever-after shakes out might be nothing like the story we have come to expect.

Jonathan Brink does something similar in his book. All the elements of the creation-to-crucifixion drama are there, but they are told in a way that changes the entire meaning of the story that has defined modern Christianity. Brink himself comes out of this very tradition, 2,000 years in the making, which has interpreted the God/Human story in a very definitive way; he clearly grasps this widely-accepted interpretation and then promptly turns it inside out.

Brink challenges the Christian framework in a manner that is, at once, supremely bold and stunningly simple. All the key elements of the story remain, but they are arranged in an entirely different way that makes the “happily ever after” something altogether new and different. It’s as though Disney’s Cinderella was re-told so that the evil stepmother is reformed, becomes the heroine and rides off, Prince Charming in tow, to begin a new life as a fairy godmother.

I spent the first 30 years of my life trying, not to make a religion work, but to have a relationship with Jesus Christ. I was an evangelical Christian in the truest sense. But about 2 years ago, I opened the door, invited all the questions, doubts and instincts I’d kept locked up tight to come in, have a seat and speak freely. I finally got honest with myself and the consensus was that not only did I not want to go to church anymore, but I could no longer say I was a Christian. I wanted to believe the “right” things, but I just didn’t, and in retrospect, I realized I hadn’t for quite some time.

Leaving Christianity was painful; I’ve likened it in many ways to a divorce. Though it was a profound and palpable relief to finally allow myself to stop fighting to keep my true feelings and thoughts at bay, Christianity was like a thread woven through the entire fabric of my life and pulling it out was simultaneously the removal of a source of huge pain and a deep, gut-wrenching loss. The desire for a personal relationship with a God who loved me wasn’t easy to give up and walk away from.

It was difficult and painful to insist on what my inner knowing says when, from all accounts, I was walking away from God by doing so. I don’t want to “walk away from God.” Decades of my life were spent wanting a personal connection with God more than any one thing in my whole life, so following my knowing, what felt like away from God, has been painful, hard and many times, desperately lonely.

Then I read this book. Brink’s interpretation of the Biblical narrative is like looking at the whole of my life with a pair of glasses on and being shocked to realize what looked and felt like one thing was something else entirely. What if it wasn’t that I was “walking away from God” at all? What if, all along, he was “calling” me away? The exercise of thinking that’s possible, for even a minute, floods me with a mixture of joy, remorse, regret, pain and sadness.

Brink looks at the Biblical narrative and sees what he calls “the God imagination” at work. To look at not just the Bible, but my own life, through that lens means letting my assumptions go. Among other things, Brink says challenging our assumptions involves “leaving old stories behind.” He goes on to say that, “it means starting over again and building new ones…finally answering the deeper questions in our souls, the ones haunting us when we sleep.” (p. 72)

The prospect of doing so is, for me, terrifying. Re-opening the book on God means going back to “the scene of the crime,” as Brink refers to it. It means returning to the very ground on which I was hurt most, knowing I might be hurt again. I know from experience that anything that’s worth anything requires just that sort of “all in” risk, but that doesn’t change that it scares me to death.

Brink responds to this very fear when he says: “Reconciling our assumptions means we just might have to engage in our own restoration. It means we just might have to tear away the covering which blinds us to the God imagination. It means coming out of hiding to discover our worst fears aren’t true.” (p. 72)

Now I have to ask: what if the stuff that has always felt “off” for me about Christianity is also “off” in God’s mind? I experienced such pain, rejection and fear during my “questioning/doubting” years that the idea that I was on the right track all along makes me weep – both for the waste and the hope. Do I have the guts to go back and take another look?

Previous to reading this book, I had easily and without equivocation left Christianity behind. Discovering the God Imagination hasn’t “brought me back into the fold” by any stretch of the imagination, but it has created a space in which I am able to look at the concept of God with new eyes, for one reason and one reason only: it paints a picture of a God who sees me with eyes that, when I look into them, I realize I have seen before. They are familiar in the way the bar of a song sung in childhood might be. The expression of love and acceptance in those eyes is what I recognize I’ve been waiting for all my life. To be honest, I don’t know what to do with that, except to keep gazing into them and follow my heart.

About the Author

Jonathan BrinkI am an business development and communications consultant. I am also the senior editor and publisher for Civitas Press. I recently published, Discovering The God Imagination: Reconstructing A Whole, New Christianity. (Civitas, 2011)View all posts by Jonathan Brink →

  • http://paradigmshift-jmac.blogspot.com/ Joe Machuta

    I should get my copy later today and I cannot wait to read it. My experience is similar in a lot of ways to Cheryl… I left 40 plus years ago and came back again with a fresh view about twenty years ago now. I don’t know how the God Imagination will square with what I have discovered. I am pretty new age in my views. New age with a very high Christology that sees Jesus as the redeemer of the world. Here is a poem that is over 40 years old from my leaving days. http://jmac-jfb.blogspot.com/2009/05/primal-dream.html

    • http://paradigmshift-jmac.blogspot.com/ Joe Machuta

      I am in the process of reading… making notations for later interaction. So far, it is presenting and interesting point of view.

      • http://www.livinginabeautifulmess.blogspot.com Cheryl Ensom Dack

        It’s fresh on my mind, as I just finished it last week, so if you want to discuss it, that would be fun!

        • http://paradigmshift-jmac.blogspot.com/ Joe Machuta

          That sounds good to me. I am making notes as I go. I have some questions. Perhaps they will be addressed later on in the book. It should take me a few more days as I am doing other stuff also including discussing on this marvelous blog. It is a great opportunity.

          • http://www.livinginabeautifulmess.blogspot.com Cheryl Ensom Dack

            Sounds good…tell me when you want to talk! cherylensomdack@gmail.com :)

          • http://paradigmshift-jmac.blogspot.com/ Joe Machuta

            Maybe we can start the discussion by your reaction to my review.

  • http://www.harmonyoftheheart.com Eddie

    Thanks for posting. A very moving testimonial. Having read the book, I can see how the book can open up hearts and minds in new and fresh ways.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.c.straka Jeff Straka

    I, too, have read the book. This is the kind of fresh theology the church is “dying” for. I am in the midst of an amazing book Jonathan recommended – “A Hidden Wholeness: The Journey Toward an Undivided Life” by Parker Palmer. It is a perfect “follow up” to Jonathan’s book. It shows how “community” needs to be re-imagined for us to find our True Self (traditional church has this wrong, too). Check a video from Palmer here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJupHyl-4qQ

    • David

      Hi Jeff,rnrnJust viewed your Palmer clip and must say I’m a bit taken back. Not sure what he was talking about that we “breath with the earth and perhaps we will see IT” (maybe our soul) not sure what IT he was talking about, but I thought maybe it’s a Avatar moment… I’m sure I must just not be understanding what he’s getting at. rnrnWould you also be kind enough to tell me what you mean by.. ” It shows how “community” needs to be re-imagined for us to find our True Self”. What do you men by finding our True Self ?rnrn

      • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

        David, Parker is a Quaker who walked away from organized faith but chose to stay in the conversation of learning. Much of his dialog is spiritual in orientation but he doesn’t create a systematic framework or dogma to follow. He simply creates a space for people to be honest. He’s very wholistic but not really New Agey in the traditional sense of what you would image. I would imagine this space of honesty is what Jeff is talking about.

        • David

          That helps explain things a little. Thanks Jonathan. Language is however important as is word choice especially in the context of Cheryl’s story. Palmer and Jeff do sound like total “New Age” to me, but I will defer to your wisdom / insight on that. Would hate to lead Cheryl down that road…

          • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.c.straka Jeff Straka

            David, in Palmer’s (and the Quaker’s) Circle of Trust community, it is not about “diagnosing and fixing” the other which is what most small groups try to do, but rather it’s about providing quiet space for the Inner Teacher to come forth in each individual and reveal the work that needs to be done. It is unfair of you to categorize me or Palmer as “New Age” simply because certain terms we use are unfamiliar.

          • David

            Jeff, Sorry if I offended, but the problem is the terms you used are not unfamiliar at all. Lots of folks involved in “Spiritual Langauge” and “New Age” ideas use this type of language so it’s difficult to know what you really mean. rnrnfor example: what is the “Inner Teacher” Is that your language for the Holy Spitit which resides in the Believer’s heart that Paul takes about ? So yah Jeff, language is important for good communications, and expressing ideas.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.c.straka Jeff Straka

            It’s not “my” language – it’s Quaker language for the Divine Spirit that resides in everyone (not just “Believers” who have said the “Sinner’s Prayer”).

          • David

            Ok we are getting somewhere now I think. Again help me because I can be a bit hard headed at times. Is the “Devine Spirit” what the Bible names the Holy Spirit of God ?rnrnAnd are you saying that all people have Gods Holy Spirit within them even if they don’t believe in God and Jesus ? rnrnJust so you know I’m not against the “sinners prayer” as God would never reject anyone who calls out to him, but feel a lot of times comming to a Loving relationship to God and Jesus and the Hosly Spirit is a process over time as God works in our hearts. Thanks for responding Jeff.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.c.straka Jeff Straka

            Yes, I don’t think it takes a “mental acknowledgment” (checking a mental box) for The Divine to suddenly “enter” a person (like there was a “God void” before). I believe that The Divine is in all (panentheism) and it is simply our becoming aware of this presence (an awakening) that “saves” us. And this is not “New Age” thought – pre-Constantine Christians believed this and Jesus taught it.nnAnd I am not against the “sinners prayer” per se, either if it is part of this awakening process. But I would not say “come into my heart” which implies separation. I would say “help me stay awake to your presence in my heart”.

          • David

            Ok Jeff I get it. Guess your not going to anser my questions in any direct manner. But I’ll give it one more try…I assume from what you said the “Devine” is in everybody ? You said “all” Does that mean everthing or everybody? And is the word or name Devine another name for God and Jesus ? rnrnJust trying to understand and hope your OK with my search here.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.c.straka Jeff Straka

            I thought I was answering your question. The Divine, God, Spirit, The Christ, the Ground of Being (however you wish to define the undefinable) is in all things – everybody, everything. One needs no prayer to bring God “in” (as if he was hovering around outside). You can read what panentheism is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PanentheismnThis belief is part of the Process-Relational thought, which I embrace wholeheartedly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Theology

      • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

        I forgot to mention that the True Self is simply the one God created but that gets hidden under all the junk. Parker’s life work has been to help people find that self. He doesn’t call it Christian, largely because he doesn’t want to define it for people.

  • http://openmindedconversations.blogspot.com/ jshmueller

    Wow! What a great analogy! And what a profound experience!rnrnAs to Cheryl’s ending: If the gaze of God’s love is true, the real “fold” she belongs to had never been left in the first place! It’s unfortunate that so many churches and well meaning Christians want to continue defining who’s in and who’s out, and erecting the very walls between people that God always meant to tear down.

  • http://www.livinginabeautifulmess.blogspot.com Cheryl Ensom Dack

    Sorry, David…It’s too late! ;) rnrnI’m teasing you, but it actually is familiar territory for me. I’m in the middle of a wonderful book by Thomas Merton at the moment and the “Real Self”/Wild Self that is rooted in Jungian thought has resonated with me for a couple years now…something deep inside says, “Yes…that’s right.” It’s something that showed up in my own dreams/instincts first and THEN I found had been written about extensively for a really long time and now it crops up all over the place, including in the Bible. rnrnI don’t feel like the idea of a “real self”/true self is incompatible with the New Testament allusion to being a “new creation,” etc. but it IS incompatible with evangelical thought for one main reason (in my mind, anyway): Evangelical Christianity teaches that we are “naturally” bad/evil/wicked/screwed up beyond repair and that it is only by God infusing his goodness in us and being righteous “through” us that we are able to do, say, think, etc. anything good or true. By contrast, the idea of the “real self” or “true self” means that there is a goodness inside of us already…you could say put there by God…and EVEN (this part is really exciting to me) that when we drill down into the real self/authentic self/instinctual self, we actually “move” into a new “place”/possibility for relating to one another in a way that is uncannily like the kingdom of heaven Jesus talked about. He didn’t say it was after death or “up in the sky,” but that it was AMONG us. rnrnI think a really basic way to explain the difference is that evangelicalism says we must “repent” of our sins (the Greek word is metanoia). Repent comes from the word “repentir” or “to be sorry for your sins.” Actually, that was a really bad translation because “metanoia” literally means “a change of mind.” You can try to frame that as “being sorry for your sin,” but I don’t read Jesus talking much about that at all. He talked way more about the kingdom of heaven being right there among them. I could go on and on about this but I’ll stop. :) rnrnThis is the first I have heard of Parker, but he sounds like someone I need to read! Any certain books you guys recommend? Is “A Hidden Wholeness” a good place to start, then?

    • David

      Cheryl, thanks for the encouragement…But it seems like the “Evangelicalicals” are really becomming an easy target these days, as if all issues “Spiritual” are the fault of the Evangelical thought on living out what Jesus said. I just don’t buy into that. Having a High View of Scripture, and understanding of Penal Substution I guess I’m in the minority here. However, that doesn’t mean I don’t agree with a lot of what you say. rnrnI think God really Loves us beyond what we can begine to understand. We are after all made in His image. I do belive he Loved us and always Loved us and will continue to Love us because he made us, breathed life into us, demonistrated His Love to us on the Cross and made a way for us to live as His Children through Jesus. I do believe the Kingdom of Heaven is here with us now. I mean where could you go to escape it ? Not even in the belly of a big Fish ! So yah I think much like you do. I believe…But there are specifc differences. I do think there are things which God doesn’t like much. Sin is one of those things. Prov chapter 6 gives us six things God hates. At the top is Pride ! Tough issue there. The last thing listed is he that sows discord among the brothern…another really tough issue. rnrnI do think Jesus had lots to say about sin…how about the woman cought in adultry. Although He loved her and had some hard words for her accursers He did tell her to go and sin no more…. rnrnAnway I’m probably not making much sense. But it sounds like to me your still Loving God and people ! Thats the key I think… rn

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Giving God’s Story Another Try « Jonathan Brink -- Topsy.com

Business development and communications for growing businesses.