Blog

Business development and communications for growing businesses.

Am I An Evangelical Follow Up

Recently I asked the question, “Am I An Evangelical?‘  The post generated 10 different responses from maybe to absolutely not. Most recognized that the term is cultural to a certain extent and its meaning has changed.

But then Cheryl Dack posted the following response that made me really smile.  In the interest of full disclosure, I do know Cheryl but I met her through my book after she asked me to submit a post for Bill Dahl’s Porpoise Diving Life.

According to Merriam Webster’s definition, evangelicalism is defined by: “emphasizing salvation by faith in the atoning death of Jesus Christ through personal conversion, the authority of Scripture, and the importance of preaching as contrasted with ritual.”

So based on what I know about you (I’m reading your book and have less than two chapters to go), I would say that you are not evangelical, at least not in the strictest sense. However, I think it can be argued that you are simply going back to the Biblical narrative and REDEFINING things like “atonement,” “reconciliation,” and “evangelize.” As Jshmueller pointed out, you talk about the “good news,” but it is not the same good news that an evangelical would traditionally define it as. If the origins of the concept of evangelizing are actually Jesus’ Great Commission (“go into all the world and spread the good news…”) a case could be made that you are returning to the ORIGINAL “good news,” before it got all mixed up with religion again.

I think that the answer to your question entirely depends on who is answering! To an “evangelical,” the answer would be “no,” I suspect. To someone like me who is reading/watching from a spot outside traditional religion, I’d say you might be more evangelical than the evangelicals.

Those are words to a writers ear.  My desire in writing Discovering The God Imagination was never to tear down my historical evangelical faith, but to inform it.

About the Author

Jonathan BrinkI am an business development and communications consultant. I am also the senior editor and publisher for Civitas Press. I recently published, Discovering The God Imagination: Reconstructing A Whole, New Christianity. (Civitas, 2011)View all posts by Jonathan Brink →

  • http://bramboniusinenglish.wordpress.com/ brambonius

    Does it matter? To some calvinists an arminian, even if he’d be a biblicist fundamentalist, isn’t even a christian… So it’s all in the eye of the beholder I guess… Go looking for the best way to understand, bring and live out the good news of christ, that’s the main point of being a christian, maybe the right word to describe it wil only be invented later… who knows what name will be used when the emerging church has emerged fully, and when post-evangelicalism has become something on it’s own? Remember that Kurt Cobain never intended to be the inventer of grunge music, he was just trying to play punk-rock…

    • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

      Well said Brambonius

      • Cheryl Ensom Dack

        LOL, Brambonius! I think you make exactly the right point, which led me to think this:rnrnI don’t think Jesus was trying to be The Savior of the World. I don’t think he was trying to be The Guy Who Started Christianity. I don’t think he was imagining how his life would look to readers of the Bible 2,000 years later. When he stood at the well with the Samaritan woman, I don’t think he was thinking about how he’d sound in the hundreds of thousands of sermons preached about it; I think he just saw a woman in pain and reached out to her. rnrnI don’t think Jesus was like a bad Christian fiction writer. No offense. But bad fiction is “plot-driven,” as Stephen King so brilliantly observed, and IMHO Christian fiction is most often guilty of creating two-dimensional characters that “act out” the plot the author decided ahead of time would be a great book. GOOD fiction, as King says, is “character-driven.” What that means is basically that the plot is simply what the characters do because of WHO THEY ARE. That’s who Jesus was, right? That’s how he lived. He was a real guy who lived his life as the real guy that he was. Period. The “plot” of his ministry unfolded as it happened…as he lived.rnrnSo back to Brambonius and Cobain. :) I think he’s made a pretty profound point. Jesus wasn’t the “inventor” of Christianity. He wasn’t burying “talking points” in his parables to be sure that the term “evangelicalism” would emerge. He lived. He loved. Period.rnrnSo maybe you’re not an evangelical, Jonathan! But I think we’re saying it’s pretty likely Jesus wasn’t, either. Jesus defied labels. None of the labels anyone tried to stick to him stuck. I know I’m done with labels. For myself and for others. And Jesus.

  • David

    Joanthan I don’t think it really matters one way or another really. You have some very pointed and strong opinions & thoughts on the traditional Biblical Narrative, but I believe you have a real heart for loving God and people and isn’t that what is really important ? Following Jesus and bringing the Gospel to others via your life, in action and word…rnrnWhy would you be concerned if folks define you as an Evanglical or not. I think you are, but these are just terms that mean different things to different people in our culture. But from a tecnical point if your concerned with people and God and presenting the Gospel I think your one of them… :-)

    • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

      David, part of my journey has been in transcending labels. This was an exercise for myself, but it required feedback from my readers. nnIn the end, I completely agree with you. I’m not really interested in labels. I’m interested in love. But part of that journey has been asking the question, What is the Gospel? It’s why I wrote my book. I wanted to know. And I made the assumption that it was never meant to be a mystery. But we did have to look.

Business development and communications for growing businesses.