Blog

Business development and communications for growing businesses.

Anne Rice Quits Christianity

Anne Rice recently quit Christianity.  I would argue that this is a significant moment in the cultural landscape of the Christian story.  Anne is a novelist of significant repute, having sold over 130 million novels including, Interview With A Vampire.  Anne was in many ways a celebrity Christian.  She wrote gothic erotica and her return to the church was seen as a significant coup d’etat for Christians.  Mike Morrell called her conversion the “second most important literary conversion since CS Lewis.” It was like winning over someone of the least likely category. Christians could point to Anne and say, “She’s now part of our team.”

Her Wikipedia page provides some insight into her return to faith:

I had experienced an old fashioned, strict Roman Catholic childhood in the 1940s and 1950s… we attended daily Mass and communion in an enormous and magnificently decorated church … Stained glass windows, the Latin Mass, the detailed answers to complex questions on good and evil—these things were imprinted on my soul forever… I left this church at age 18… I wanted to know what was happening, why so many seemingly good people didn’t believe in any organized religion yet cared passionately about their behavior and value of their lives… I broke with the church violently and totally… I wrote many novels that without my being aware of it reflected my quest for meaning in a world without God.

But just this week Anne went up and quit Christianity.  She’s not leaving Christ, just what many would call an institutional image of what we think is Christianity.  She said on her Facebook page:

For those who care, and I understand if you don’t: Today I quit being a Christian. I’m out. I remain committed to Christ as always but not to being “Christian” or to being part of Christianity. It’s simply impossible for me to “belong” to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For ten …years, I’ve tried. I’ve failed. I’m an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else.

She followed with a second post and elaborated:

As I said below, I quit being a Christian. I’m out. In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of …Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen.

Her two posts touched a nerve generating over 5,500 likes and 2,000 comments. I would suggest that people are recognizing a cultural story that has developed within Christianity that just doesn’t work.

Doug Pagitt offered up a response on his website that I think gets at the heart of it.

At least I don’t believe in the versions of Christianity that have prevailed for the last fifteen hundred years, the ones that were perfectly suitable in their time and place but have little connection with this time and place. The ones that answer questions we no longer ask and fail to consider ques- tions we can no longer ignore. The ones that don’t mesh with what we know about God and the world and our place in it. I want to be very clear: I am not conflicted because I struggle to believe. I am conflicted because I want to believe differently.

This desire to believe differently is at the heart of my book.  We need a new understanding of Christianity, one that reconciles with its own story.

Ed Stetzer, noted church analyst and author commented on her announcement with this tweet.

@/AnneRiceAuthor: You can’t love Jesus & hate His wife. She’s a mess, but the church is the bride of Christ. Don’t give up.”

I would argue that Ed missed the point.  Here’s the deal.  The cats out of the bag.  Christianity is losing its ability to speak to a culture in a way that is redeeming and life giving.  Its  known more for its politics than its meaning.  It’s more about morality than redemption….rejection rather than love.  Anne isn’t rejecting Jesus.  And she’s not rejecting the church.  She’s rejecting a deeply embedded culture understanding of what is expected of someone who says they are a Christian.

It didn’t take long for someone to slam her, posting this video.  It makes all kinds of silly assumptions about her but is steeped in a deep religious fear.  Sad really.

Anne’s final comments the following day seem to sum up her reasoning:

My faith in Christ is central to my life. My conversion from a pessimistic atheist lost in a world I didn’t understand, to an optimistic believer in a universe created and sustained by a loving God is crucial to me. But following Christ does not mean following His followers. Christ is infinitely more important than Christianity and always will be, no matter what Christianity is, has been, or might become.

Interested in your responses.

About the Author

Jonathan BrinkI am an business development and communications consultant. I am also the senior editor and publisher for Civitas Press. I recently published, Discovering The God Imagination: Reconstructing A Whole, New Christianity. (Civitas, 2011)View all posts by Jonathan Brink →

  • http://kingdomgrace.wordpress.com Linda

    Jonathan,
    Yours is one of the more nuanced posts that I've read about Anne's comments. Most, like Stetzer's tweet, read into Anne's comments that she is rejecting church. However, as you said, her comments indicate that she is rejecting today's cultural image of Christianity. She emphasized the importance of following Christ, and I trust that the Spirit can and will continue to knit her into fellowship and community in the Body, even if that looks different than what others might expect.

  • Kathy

    I have been confessing to my family and close friends for some time now that I have a difficult time identifying myself as a “Christian” because of the negative baggage it carries in so many of the circles where I care to have a voice and vote. It stems from exactly the kinds of “anti-isms” that Rice identifies. I think there are far more folks like us than not.

  • http://www.adamlehman.us AdamLehman

    “christianity” is in NO WAY a definition of “Christ's Body”

    so you can reject a religion without rejecting Jesus.

    at least I think so….

  • Pastormattl

    Some of us are re-imagining church in a postmodern, post-Christian age. Rice's defection is a sign of the deep disconnection of Jesus and the gospels from the modern north American religious institutions/expression we have accepted as “church” for 2 centuries.
    To love the church is to long for her reformation. To love the church is to seek the Kingdom of God, which begins with metanoia-a reorientation of the heart and mind to love the things Jesus loves. Modern Christianity has loved moralisms and dogmatisms that divide. Deep tribal warfare, mostly “civil” warfare with some exceptions, between rival Christian groups has eroded the call to unity and common gospel mission. I live in a land of 300,000 congregations. Past divisions created this broken ecclesial landscape. Churches continue to divide over sexual morality, the hot button in our culture. I think Anne Rice, like so many Americans, is free to exercise religious authority by her own volition. I wonder if we are ready to address Anne's spiritual ennui with the formation of an authentic body of believers,seeking to live with Jesus in the midst of extreme cultural change. I want to be part of a church that loves the world, seeks to partner with God in the world's redemption, and offers itself to the world as a sign of eternal hope.

  • http://www.casadeblundell.com/jonathan jdblundell

    I understand her frustration. In fact, I just talked with some friends who are living in Costa Rica who told me they seldom use the word Christian because of the baggage it carries with it in Latin America. I think we're seeing that more and more even in America. Just look at the religious views listed on Facebook. Mine says “Religious Views: follower of The Way.”

    As you said, Anne (and others) aren't rejecting Christ, we're simply rejecting what society has and is saying about our faith.

    Anne Rice just happens to be a more high-profile example of this trend.

    I definitely don't fault her for voicing her opinions about her frustrations about Christianity.

    And who knows, perhaps she'll find a new home in the UCC?

    http://www.christianpost.com/article/20100801/u…

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    Linda, thanks for seeing deeper into the story with me. I agree that as she takes this step she may just find a deeper faith.

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    Kathy, I think you will find that you are not alone in your anti-isms.

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    I have to seriously and strongly agree Adam.

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    I want to be part of that body too.

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    I'm curious what her response will be too. But what struck me about Anne is that her leaving felt much like the emotional process many in the emergence movement shared and felt. It might lead her to the UCC, but I'd be curious if she would take a broader approach and live in many circles.

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    Linda, in some ways her reasoning reminds me of your story and TPFKATC.

  • http://openmindedconversations.blogspot.com/ jshmueller

    I couldn't agree more. Ed obviously misunderstood what exactly Anne wants to leave behind. I'm just wondering here how the concern he expressed is addressed best. What are the actual implications of the common perception of the church as something that produces more death than life? That the church has stopped to be the church and that leaving is the only option to maintain a sense of spiritual integrity and get rid of the baggage that keeps people from coming to Christ? Or in Ed's words that the bride of Christ is a horrible mess but that she's still loved and deserves every attention to get that mess cleaned up? Isn't the real dividing issue here the underlying distinction between the love of Christ for his bride and the love of Christ for all, period? Why else would leaving an institutional expression be seen as such a big deal? Are people outside the institutional church in a bigger mess than those on the inside? I'm sure there are plenty of examples which won't allow us to make any generalizations like that. What Anne captured about the nature of the mess is remarkably perceptive and accurate: wherever love is denied because of the underlying “in-and-out” thinking, death reigns and Christ is denied.

  • paul del signore

    hi Jonathon, nice post. Although I can understand the frustration Anne is feeling with the Church, I don't agree with the idea of 'quitting' but rather believe that reformation is best impacted from the inside out. With her popularity, she had the opportunity to be influential probably more than most of us do. I wrote my thoughts in a bit more detail here:
    http://www.exit-25.com/2010/08/i-quit-being-a-c…

  • paul del signore

    hi Jonathon, nice post. Although I can understand the frustration Anne is feeling with the Church, I don’t agree with the idea of ‘quitting’ but rather believe that reformation is best impacted from the inside out. With her popularity, she had the opportunity to be influential probably more than most of us do. I wrote my thoughts in a bit more detail here: nhttp://www.exit-25.com/2010/08/i-quit-being-a-christian-anne-rice/

  • http://twitter.com/jeffstraka jeffstraka

    Here's what I think Ed Stetzer (and most “Christians”) get wrong: they think the Church and Christianity are one in the same and think the Church ONLY consists of Christians. I think the Church is the Body of Christ and so it includes ALL the Children of God – every single person on this planet. You can't “leave” the Church, the Body – you are cosmically in it. It is CHRISTIANITY – the institutional religion that has been co-opted and taken off the track since 313 – that Anne (and I) have an issue with. It is this RELIGION OF RULES that Jesus NEVER came start (he was only trying to REFORM what existed) that Anne (and I) disown.

    We were blessed to listen to Stanley Hauerwas speak in Marietta last night, and his talk about “America's god dying” only reinforced what Anne speaks of. (See http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2010/07… ) And if you dare, check out this link and scroll down to “Celebrate America” and watch as much as you can stomach. It is this EMPIRE-CHRISTIANITY that needs to go: http://vidego.316networks.com/player.php?p=qyy0…

  • http://twitter.com/jeffstraka jeffstraka

    Here’s what I think Ed Stetzer (and most “Christians”) get wrong: they think the Church and Christianity are one in the same and think the Church ONLY consists of Christians. I think the Church is the Body of Christ and so it includes ALL the Children of God – every single person on this planet. You can’t “leave” the Church, the Body – you are cosmically in it. It is CHRISTIANITY – the institutional religion that has been co-opted and taken off the track since 313 – that Anne (and I) have an issue with. It is this RELIGION OF RULES that Jesus NEVER came start (he was only trying to REFORM what existed) that Anne (and I) disown.

    We were blessed to listen to Stanley Hauerwas speak in Marietta last night, and his talk about “America’s god dying” only reinforced what Anne speaks of. (See http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2010/07… ) And if you dare, check out this link and scroll down to “Celebrate America” and watch as much as you can stomach. It is this EMPIRE-CHRISTIANITY that needs to go: http://vidego.316networks.com/player.php?p=qyy0…

  • Pingback: Listening To The Fruit Of The Church « Jonathan Brink

Business development and communications for growing businesses.