Blog

Business development and communications for growing businesses.

Non-Violent Resistance

kick

What if the way to end a war begins with saying, “There is no war.”?

A couple of days ago, I was browsing through my Blog Reader and came across this title”

“Winning The Drug War By Ending It”

The title refers to a short post from Andrew Sullivan on the war on drugs, but it got me thinking about what Jesus said.

Luke 6:29 – If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also.

What if Jesus is giving us the more radical and wholistic means to end conflict. What if the best way to end conflict is to simply hold onto the idea that, “There is no war.”  When we strike back, aren’t we validating the notion that there is a war?

What if the most courageous person in a fight is the one who is willing to see the true identity and dignity of the other person, and by holding back the punch, we are reminding the other person of who they really are?  A child of the living God, called very good.  And when we hold onto to that standard of justice, we are validating it in our own life.  We are in essence saying, “This is true.”  And not because it is true cosmically, even though it is, but because we need we need it to be true in our lives.

So when we say, “there is no war” were not ignoring the obvious in justice.  We’re calling out the reality that non-violent resistance is actually first about holding on to what is true in our lives?

About the Author

Jonathan BrinkI am an business development and communications consultant. I am also the senior editor and publisher for Civitas Press. I recently published, Discovering The God Imagination: Reconstructing A Whole, New Christianity. (Civitas, 2011)View all posts by Jonathan Brink →

  • kylejnolan

    Read Walter Wink's Jesus and Nonviolence, or the part of Jesus for President referring to Wink's work about Jesus' teaching on turning the other cheek.

    Not only is Jesus calling us to recognize the humanity of the one who has initiated violence, he's calling us to force them to recognize our own humanity.

  • kylejnolan

    Read Walter Wink's Jesus and Nonviolence, or the part of Jesus for President referring to Wink's work about Jesus' teaching on turning the other cheek.

    Not only is Jesus calling us to recognize the humanity of the one who has initiated violence, he's calling us to force them to recognize our own humanity.

  • http://www.leaderlounge.com/ Storms

    What if that person is attempting to hurt someone else, say a child? Should we fight to protect the innocent?

  • http://www.leaderlounge.com/ Storms

    What if that person is attempting to hurt someone else, say a child? Should we fight to protect the innocent?

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    Thank you Storm. You have dislodge a post about this. It is a legitimate question and one I've wrestled with. I think I've finally found the answer. Should be up sometime in the next couple of days.

  • http://jonathanbrink.com Jonathan Brink

    Thank you Storm. You have dislodge a post about this. It is a legitimate question and one I've wrestled with. I think I've finally found the answer. Should be up sometime in the next couple of days.

  • http://www.harmonyoftheheart.com Ezrocket

    Seems like it’s been awhile since this was posted. But I would say there is something Marshall Rosenberg calls “the protective use of force.” I tend to agree with him. When it comes to protecting life we can use force. There is a difference between violently striking back and using force to protect your life or the life of others. nnWhat Jesus is talking about is not only seeing the humanity in the offender but also doing something creative to encourage the offender to see the humanity in us. Martin Luther King modeled this well as did Ghandi. Walter Wink talks about this as well in Jesus and Nonviolence and The Powers that Be.

  • http://www.facebook.com/monachusbellator Dave Everly

    For me, an option for the oppressed cannot be an option against the oppressor. I can’t use offense as an excuse for violence or hate or non-peace. The challenge is to take the side of the oppressed without taking sides against the oppressors; how to oppose without denouncing; how to ‘be with’ without ‘being against’. Gandhi’s example, to me, is spot on: he stood firmly with the oppressed, but he never hated, humiliated or spoke badly about the British. Violence in any form will only perpetuate violence and postpone the Kingdom and peace. There are always difficult decisions to be made in extreme circumstances. But, if I decide, in everyday life, to refuse the violence of force in any form (hate, judgment, physical, emotional, etc), I become, as Jesus, one who is truly a peace-bearer. Even in criticism and the denouncement of others, I show my departure from peace. Actions that impose or force change upon that which is denounced as unjust or evil are violent. “In this world hatred is not dispelled by hatred; by love alone is hatred dispelled.” Loving our enemies is probably the most difficult way to live.

Business development and communications for growing businesses.