The Liminal Problem

If you read this blog you’ll know that I am a proponent of exploring the dialog of the emerging church and what it means to create a holistic approach to spiritual formation. I’ve highlighted many of my concerns about the traditional models of church but at the same time, I have tremendous hope for what will emerge over the next twenty to fifty years. I believe the conversation, although painful at times, will have a tremendous regenerative affect on the church. I, like many, believe we are in a reformation period.
But the in between time is called a liminal period. It’s the not was but not yet, which creates a tremendous disequilibrium in some people. We’re leaving what was for something we have yet to experience and that is not always easy. And right now kind of feels like summer vacation to be honest. And this is simply a metaphor but I don’t want to be in junior high anymore. I want to explore what is in front of me, not just behind me. And I’m really looking forward to what I have yet to experience.
In the process many writers have explored what’s behind us. Frank Viola and George Barna have caused quite a stir with the re-release of Pagan Christianity. For those who are reading it, Grace has a lengthy breakdown that is an excellent summary of the points in the book. She too highlights some of the comments and criticisms that the books brings to the church as well as invites on itself.
But her posts got me thinking about the general mood that the book highlights, namely the liminal problem. We are beginning to deconstruct the old forms, of which PC is a necessary step in doing. But many aren’t yet seeing the next reconstructive models. We are beginning to recognize the lack of discipleship but have yet to test new models. This tension old brings fuel to the fire and allows the detractors to dismiss what is emerging as heretical or simply stupid. We’re leaving the traditional church for what, they ask, and we don’t have a clear answer we can point to. We know what we don’t want and yet we don’t yet know what we do want. This lack of an answer allows many to simply dismiss the conversation. And they can if they want to. They don’t have to go down this road.
But for those who are staying in the exploration of what’s ahead, it sometimes feels lonely. It would simply be sooooo much easier to just turn around and do junior high again. The structures are set. The models have been tested and work, to an extent. What they produce is now in question but its just so much easier to stick with them and hope for the best. The tension of staying in the good is easier than letting it go for what is the possibility of great. Jim Collins explored this in Good To Great.
And I ask myself, “Why do you keep going forward? What is it that allows you to stay in the tension?” And my answer is that I want to know my Father. I want to know Him. And when stuff like Reveal comes out, and Pagan Christianity, and many more, it simply adds fuel to the fire. It also serves as a reminder that there is so much more to be had. And to be honest my heart has been calling me forwards for a long time. I’ve seen too many good things happen to settle for good now. I for one believe that discipleship is possible and necessary to what it means to follow Jesus in today’s world.
What about you? What do you feel about the liminal problem?
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
-
Cheri Coleman
-
grace
-
Aaron G
-
jonathanbrink
-
jonathanbrink
-
Jeromy
-
Jeromy
-
Elle
-
jonathanbrink
-
jonathanbrink
-
grace
-
Elle
-
Jeromy
-
Jeromy
-
Karl Usher
-
jonathanbrink
-
Peggy
-
Joe Miller
-
Pops
-
Jonathan Brink










